A conservative Soul-Mate body that fully complies with all that scripture teaches, modernised and minus controversial unbiblical baggage. Soul-mate.org avoids biblically controversial matters, advocating and returning to those ways practised by Jesus and the apostles. To build our house on the rock rather than sand.

In other words, soul-mate orthodoxy is a composite of winning aspects of Christendom (biblically building on the rock rather than the sand), while deemphasizing seriously biblically controversial baggage. It's aim is to achieve the fruit of God's Holy Spirit, leading to revival. Serious unbiblical controversy is counterproductive to that.
If revival does occur, and the promised outpouring of the Holy Spirit blesses that approach with the latter rain (with many "consistently" contributing to that outpouring) then that location may well become home.
Unfruitful movements haven't resulted in a latter rain revival, so we know there's work to do to be worthy of the promised latter rain.

• Similar to the Mennonite way of life for leaders, but more thorough and modernised.
• True to all the 10 and Jesus commandments, including Saturday sabbath, and communal expensive property, ie Christian neo-Levite
• Having an audited Trust to lease or rent budget housing to those involved in the great commission, using 3d printed houses on a communal NZ property like a camp ground or like a hostel. And to own expensive items of property, for leasing longterm or a lifetime, for free, to campus members.
• Teaching those things elucidated on by http://god-help.org
• Only reverencing infinite God/Jesus.
• Operating an internet radio or TV channel, producing programs for those broadcasts.
• Researching scientifically robust answers to the deep questions raised by society, in a faith building manner. Recognizing that society no longer have a basic understanding of christian concepts (more so in nonchristian cultures), per Ken Ham's Foundations DVD series at answersingenesis.org or search youtube foundations ken ham . Even christians in developed nations have varying degrees of ignorance according to Pew research surveys.
• Having a church to be run by campus pastors who fully believe in this movement, with contributions to/from god-help.org and soul-mate.tv Being somewhat like Mennonites in communal living for Christian public figures, and SDAs in commandment keeping, but different in a few matters. If we relaxed those way of life issues, i think we would become ineffective, due to lack of any anointing.
• Tending toward self sufficiency, and hydroponic glasshouse gardens.

In some ways, ideas rule (ie Wisdom/Truth = "The Way/Truth/Life" & Prov 2:1-11, 31:26), and their proponents are only temporary contributors to that. Infinite God/Jesus, through the (biblically consistent, with Words having heptadic structure)Holy Spirit, chart a path of life through humanly/finitely intractable possibilities.
More on this topic --
God's Wisdom & Truth Rather Than Man's (20 minutes Charles Stanley)

If somehow this movement rings true, in it's entirety, to sponsors, then funding will enable quick development and hiring staff. To be worthy of God's blessing, we strive for thoroughly biblical practices or way of life. Disobedience of different degrees has limited the Holy Spirit in our nations, so that authentic revival seems impossible, until things are sorted out in a thorough manner. While we dismiss that reality check, other belief systems are prevailing, in multicultural societies.

As an engineer, i cherry pick the best of Christian teaching, thought to optimize fruitfulness through orthodoxy, and deemphasize highly controversial aspects that aren't essential to the Christian way of life.
That's not necessarily saying deemphasized topics don't have a suggested contribution, but to build on the rock rather than on the sand of disputed or controversial scholarship.
If we aspire to lead internationally in our scientific society we are required to emulate the rigor of modern cultures, not dealing in half truths, however unintentional. Sloppy scholarship is a recipe for crisis of confidence and counterfeit pet theories, not untypical of what cause youth to abandon church once they go to university.
To dot our i's and cross t's requires dissecting the whole counsel on the topic, not just parts, and writing a webpage treatise or ebook about it. I'm also interested in gaining further insight by considering the chronological order in which the NT books were written, to learn when Paul, James, and other books made summary statement/s on the topic -- https://www.biblestudytools.com/resources/guide-to-bible-study/order-books-new-testament.html .
(More on this topic -
LawAndJesus.html
LawAndGrace.html).

Discussion documents are alright, no one has all the insights, but where there's rigor available, discussion ought to address it's pros and cons in a well reasoned thorough and logical -key issues- manner, and ebook, that reduces susceptibility to half truths, in the international community. Such an effort can require input from special interest folks or forums, to manage unknowns and the work.